Design structure matrix
Dependency structure matrices for architecture and process analysis. Declare elements and their dependencies and the engine renders the square matrix, then does the analysis a picture cannot: partitioning into a sequenced, block-triangular order, detection of the cyclic blocks that must be iterated, and counts of the feedback marks above the diagonal that quantify how much rework the current sequence forces.
In the same space
Most users come to Design structure matrix from Lattix, Cambridge DSM tools or Excel dependency matrices. flowss runs this engine in the browser — no install, shareable via URL, exportable to PNG / SVG / PDF / source.
Syntax at a glance
elements: Concept, Styling, Packaging, Body
Styling <- Concept
Packaging <- Concept, Styling
Body <- PackagingPaste this in the Studio code pane to see Design structure matrix render live. The full grammar is at the upstream-docs link above.
Sample templates
All 13 →Fifteen engineering activities of an EV programme carrying 39 dependency marks, computing that the plan's workstream ordering leaves 7 rework loops and that resequencing cuts them to 3, quarantined in three iteration blocks: battery/powertrain/thermal, body/closures/crash and the software–homologation–tooling–pilot tail.
Sixteen services of a commerce platform taken in the alphabetical order the service registry lists them, where partitioning turns 23 backwards call dependencies into 4 and exposes a five-service checkout core — checkout, orders, inventory, fraud scoring, payments — that no deployment order can untangle.
Sixteen build and assurance activities for an electronic health record go-live, computing that the project plan's build order carries 5 rework loops and that only 2 survive partitioning, inside a five-activity order-set/interface/testing block and the medication–allergy dictionary pair.
Team DSM of eleven squads in a retail bank's payments division read in inputs-in-columns convention, turning 25 hand-off dependencies listed in org-chart order into a sequence with 3 feedback marks and naming the card/fraud/onboarding/data quartet and the treasury–reporting pair as the groups that need a shared planning cadence.
Fourteen design activities for retrofitting goods-to-person robotics into a live distribution centre, listed by engineering discipline as the vendor's scope document lists them, computing that discipline order forces 10 rework loops where the real sequence needs 3 — a four-way slotting/racking/fleet/charging sizing loop plus the pick-station and labour-model pair.
Fifteen validation activities for a new taught master's degree taken in the order the approval form's sections ask for them, computing that 16 of the 35 dependency marks run backwards there against 3 in the partitioned sequence, and resolving the work into three negotiation pairs: modules with credits, assessment with the external examiner, and staffing with the timetable.
dsm · ← Browse all engines · Quick-start guide