Argument map
Native argument maps for philosophy, critical thinking, debate, and legal reasoning. Declare a central `claim`, then `support` and `object` arguments either attacking the claim or rebutting other arguments. PRO arguments render green, CON arguments red, with arrows pointing FROM each argument TO whatever it supports or attacks. Rebuttals nest naturally.
In the same space
Most users come to Argument map from Argunet or Rationale. Glyph runs this engine in the browser — no install, shareable via URL, exportable to PNG / SVG / PDF / source.
Syntax at a glance
claim C "We should X"
support S1 "Reason 1" for C
object O1 "Counter" against CPaste this in the Studio code pane to see Argument map render live. The full grammar is at the upstream-docs link above.
Sample templates
All 11 →Classic policy debate with rebuttals.
Pro / con / rebuttal structure on AI labour displacement.
Economics policy debate with empirical sub-arguments.
Ethics-textbook style.
Lawyer-style argument map for a torts dispute.
Pro/con map for nuclear power policy.
argmap · ← Browse all engines · Quick-start guide